Difference between revisions of "Talk:Automated transport systems"

From AdCiv
Jump to: navigation, search
(Cars)
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
=Cars=
 
=Cars=
Note that enough people really like driving cars that it will not become fully automated.
+
We now have the technology to make self-driving, very light, electric cars that use a fifth the energy of conventional cars. These can be much safer than normal cars.
 +
 
 +
==Efficiency==
 +
Most cars get less than 40 miles per gallon. Well-designed electric cars can get up around 200mpg [http://www.xprize.org/media-center/press-release/three-teams-awarded-share-of-10-million-purse-in-progressive-insurance-au]. The [http://www.aptera.com/ Aptera] gets 330mpg
  
 
Electric/fuel cell vehicles are finally catching up with the performance of petrol cars. The Tesla Roadster proves this: cheaper to run than an ordinary car, 125mph top speed, 0-60mph in 4 seconds, 244 mile range, 3.5 hours to charge.
 
Electric/fuel cell vehicles are finally catching up with the performance of petrol cars. The Tesla Roadster proves this: cheaper to run than an ordinary car, 125mph top speed, 0-60mph in 4 seconds, 244 mile range, 3.5 hours to charge.
  
The main issue is [[Energy#Storing_energy|energy storage]] - how do you store energy in a way that's as dense as the caloric energy in petrol? Batteries? Ultracapacitors? Flywheels? Fuel cells? Compressed air? A combination of these? Batteries have environmental issues of their own, and need to get lighter. Ultracapacitor technology is getting better, but still is nowhere near the density of petrol; nanotech will help here. Fuel cells have high energy density; ultracapacitors have high power ddensity, so perhaps a hybrid (like the one Riversimple are working on) is the most promising.
+
[[Energy#Storing_energy|energy storage]]: Batteries are getting lighter because of nanoengineering. Ultracapacitor technology is getting better, but still is nowhere near the density of petrol. Hydrogen fuel cell, electric battery and hybrids with motors have all outperform standard cars, and the gap will continue to widen.  
  
The other issue is energy efficiency. Regenerative braking technology is now pretty good. Carbon fiber is 4 times lighter than steel and 5 times stronger. It is 14 times more expensive, but you would make that back in fuel costs coz it's lighter. Carbon fiber is progressively getting cheaper and being used more and more in cars. Third generation photovoltaics in windows and paint will allow cars to produce their own energy on-the-move.
+
Fuel cells have high energy density; ultracapacitors have high power ddensity, so perhaps a hybrid (like the one Riversimple are working on) is the most promising.
  
Open-source cars. OScar, "c,mm,n". [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkgoNnKCA4s Riversimple's open-source, carbon fiber, fuel cell Urban car] ([http://www.40fires.org/ plans here])and [http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3399/3184500508_489ed6b757.jpg their much sexier LifeCar].
+
Regenerative braking technology can reduce energy needs 10%. Carbon fiber is 4 times lighter than steel and 5 times stronger. It is 14 times more expensive, but you would make that back in fuel costs coz it's lighter. Carbon fiber is progressively getting cheaper and being used more and more in cars.  
  
Vehicles that tilt (like the [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKvMwzI6NMk Audi Snook concept]) can take corners much tighter
+
Third generation photovoltaics in windows and paint will allow cars to produce their own energy on-the-move.
 +
 
 +
==Open-source cars==
 +
*OScar
 +
*"c,mm,n"
 +
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkgoNnKCA4s Riversimple's open-source, carbon fiber, fuel cell Urban car] ([http://www.40fires.org/ plans here])and [http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3399/3184500508_489ed6b757.jpg their much sexier LifeCar].
 +
*http://p2pfoundation.net/Product_Hacking#Mobility:_Vehicles
  
 
==Self-driving cars==
 
==Self-driving cars==
There is a competition to be held July-October 2010 in which 4 unmanned cars will drive from Italy to China delivering goods [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VIAC].  
+
A lot of progress was made on autonomous cars in 2010. The technology exists and is fully tested; it just needs to be introduced on the ground. 4 unmanned cars drove from Italy to China delivering goods [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VIAC]. Google has a fleet of modified Prius cars that have driven 140,000 miles without incident, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driverless_car#Fully_autonomous
  
 
Center for Automotive Research Stanford (CARS) doing a lot of work in this area, including cars that are driven by humans, but have smart systems so they "cannot crash"
 
Center for Automotive Research Stanford (CARS) doing a lot of work in this area, including cars that are driven by humans, but have smart systems so they "cannot crash"
Line 53: Line 62:
 
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exdUD02JryI
 
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exdUD02JryI
 
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YUjlKA6tVU
 
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YUjlKA6tVU
 
  
 
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_piO849uRdI Impressive video of an autonomous car doing controlled high-speed parking]
 
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_piO849uRdI Impressive video of an autonomous car doing controlled high-speed parking]
 +
 +
==Safety==
 +
Computer-controlled cars will have less accidents.
 +
 +
Stronger materials will make cars safer.
 +
 +
The huge reductions we can achieve in the mass of the vehicles will make a collision a much less serious event.
 +
 +
Vehicles that tilt (like the [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKvMwzI6NMk Audi Snook concept] or the [http://www.monotracer.com/index.php?lang=en X-Tracer) can take corners much tighter

Revision as of 07:31, 19 April 2011

This 'discussion page' is currently used to hold notes for the development of this website (however it can still be used for discussion)

Current situation

Severe injuries from road accidents = 36,000 jumbos crash landing — this is reality of road transport. Likelihood of being killed on the road is something like 1 in 200 (need to find ref). Number one killer of young people [1] and by far the leading cause of accidental death [2].

  • 28% of greenhouse gas emissions [3]
  • Land use in cities. Roads cover a huge percentage of urban land (need to find figures, probably about a third). A more space-efficient transport network (like PRT) would allow for more greenery
  • According to Wikipedia, within the EU, 44% of goods are transported by roads and 85% of people

Financial cost of road traffic accidents estimated at over $120 billion in the US and over $193 billion in the Europe Union. (Found in slideshow from Delphi Automotive Integrated Safety Systems - need to find source).

Options

  • Trains
    • Light rail
      • [4][5] Trains could be a lot cheaper to build if high-tension
    • Maglev
      • Gravity vacuum maglev (almost no energy required)
    • Possibility of shared vehicles. (Similar to the schemes that exist with bicycles in many cities - DublinBikes etc.) The winner of the 2009 Buckminster Fuller challenge was a system of small electric cars and scooters which would be docked at points around a city (where they could charge). You swipe a card and one of the vehicles unlocks and you drive it and drop it off at another dock. There are plans to bring this in for several cities [6].
  • Aircraft


  • Human powered - International Human-Powered Vehicle Association is a dynamic organization of hobbyists designing and testing human powered land, air and water vehicles and even submarines. Some of the stuff there is pretty amazing: somebody flew 74 miles in a pedal-powered plane, somebody else broke 82mph in a recumbent bicycle. What's more, the community of people doing this are very much in favour of free and open design. Human powered vehicles will probably remain something people do mostly for fun, rather than as part of an economic infrastructure.

http://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/skycat/

Cars

We now have the technology to make self-driving, very light, electric cars that use a fifth the energy of conventional cars. These can be much safer than normal cars.

Efficiency

Most cars get less than 40 miles per gallon. Well-designed electric cars can get up around 200mpg [7]. The Aptera gets 330mpg

Electric/fuel cell vehicles are finally catching up with the performance of petrol cars. The Tesla Roadster proves this: cheaper to run than an ordinary car, 125mph top speed, 0-60mph in 4 seconds, 244 mile range, 3.5 hours to charge.

energy storage: Batteries are getting lighter because of nanoengineering. Ultracapacitor technology is getting better, but still is nowhere near the density of petrol. Hydrogen fuel cell, electric battery and hybrids with motors have all outperform standard cars, and the gap will continue to widen.

Fuel cells have high energy density; ultracapacitors have high power ddensity, so perhaps a hybrid (like the one Riversimple are working on) is the most promising.

Regenerative braking technology can reduce energy needs 10%. Carbon fiber is 4 times lighter than steel and 5 times stronger. It is 14 times more expensive, but you would make that back in fuel costs coz it's lighter. Carbon fiber is progressively getting cheaper and being used more and more in cars.

Third generation photovoltaics in windows and paint will allow cars to produce their own energy on-the-move.

Open-source cars

Self-driving cars

A lot of progress was made on autonomous cars in 2010. The technology exists and is fully tested; it just needs to be introduced on the ground. 4 unmanned cars drove from Italy to China delivering goods [8]. Google has a fleet of modified Prius cars that have driven 140,000 miles without incident, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driverless_car#Fully_autonomous

Center for Automotive Research Stanford (CARS) doing a lot of work in this area, including cars that are driven by humans, but have smart systems so they "cannot crash"

Impressive video of an autonomous car doing controlled high-speed parking

Safety

Computer-controlled cars will have less accidents.

Stronger materials will make cars safer.

The huge reductions we can achieve in the mass of the vehicles will make a collision a much less serious event.

Vehicles that tilt (like the Audi Snook concept or the [http://www.monotracer.com/index.php?lang=en X-Tracer) can take corners much tighter