Difference between revisions of "Talk:Free and open-source software"
From AdCiv
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
The fact that thousands of other people are able to make use of the software having put in no effort themselves and haven't paid any money simply isn't an issue - after all it effectively costs nothing to replicate the software and the open-source developers are only too happy that it is proving useful to a wider audience. It is truly maximizing it's utility. | The fact that thousands of other people are able to make use of the software having put in no effort themselves and haven't paid any money simply isn't an issue - after all it effectively costs nothing to replicate the software and the open-source developers are only too happy that it is proving useful to a wider audience. It is truly maximizing it's utility. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Other software to list: | ||
| + | *Open source radio: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6241923.stm | ||
| + | *http://www.jokosher.org/ | ||
Revision as of 21:11, 19 January 2007
Panel on why people contribute - perhaps shared with collaborative design section
The amazing complexity of some these projects
Wikimedia commons
Books
Creative commons etc.
Paragraph largely made redundant by the free riders section:
The fact that thousands of other people are able to make use of the software having put in no effort themselves and haven't paid any money simply isn't an issue - after all it effectively costs nothing to replicate the software and the open-source developers are only too happy that it is proving useful to a wider audience. It is truly maximizing it's utility.
Other software to list:
- Open source radio: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6241923.stm
- http://www.jokosher.org/
