Difference between revisions of "Automated transport systems/VacMagLev"

From AdCiv
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
As noted above, trains are one of the most energy-efficient means of moving people and freight from A to B. What energy is lost is mostly due to the friction between the wheels and and the track, and the friction between the train and the air (i.e. air resistance). Magnetic levitation (MagLev) trains solve the first of these; they have no friction between the trains and the tracks because the train does not touch the track. Instead it hovers above it due to electromagnetic repulsion between the two. MagLev trains are therefore much more efficient and capable of greater speeds than ordinary trains. The second energy-drain, air resistance, can be eliminated by housing the MagLev train in a vacuum. This is called vacuum-enhanced magnetic levitation (or VacMagLev) and was pioneered by Gerard O'Neill, who said that VacMagLev would allow goods to travel “from New York to Orlando in half an hour... [using] less energy than... a liter of gasoline”[http://challenge.bfi.org/application_summary/51#].
+
[[Image:VacMagLev.jpg|center|350px]]
 +
As noted [[Automated transport systems#Intro|above]], trains are one of the most energy-efficient means of moving people and freight from A to B. What energy is lost is mostly due to the friction between the wheels and and the track, and the friction between the train and the air (i.e. air resistance). Magnetic levitation (MagLev) trains solve the first of these; they have no friction between the trains and the tracks because the train does not touch the track. Instead it hovers above it due to electromagnetic repulsion between the two. MagLev trains are therefore much more efficient and capable of greater speeds than ordinary trains. MagLev trains have been in use for decades. The second energy-drain, air resistance, can be eliminated by housing the MagLev train in a vacuum. This is called vacuum-enhanced magnetic levitation (or VacMagLev, or VacTrain technology, or evacuated tube transport) and was pioneered by Gerard O'Neill, who said that VacMagLev would allow goods to travel "from New York to Orlando in half an hour... [using] less energy than... a liter of gasoline"<sup>[http://challenge.bfi.org/application_summary/51#]</sup>.
  
Of all the new transport-technology options on the menu for 21st century man, VacMagLev is outstanding for its speed and its energy-efficiency. One [http://challenge.bfi.org/application_summary/51# proposal] by Daniel Wade outlines how such technology could be used to move goods of any kind around the world at an incredible 3200km/h (2000mph) with minimal energy. A network of such pipes could be set up between the world's cities, allowing goods to be moved from anywhere to anywhere in a few hours.
+
Of all the new transport-technology options on the menu for 21st century man, VacMagLev is outstanding for its speed, its energy-efficiency and the ease of automation. One [http://challenge.bfi.org/application_summary/51# proposal] by Daniel Wade outlines how such technology could be used to move goods of any kind around the world at an incredible 3200km/h (2000mph) with minimal energy. The most ambitious designs envision speeds of up to 8000km/h (5000mph). To put this in perspective, this is about ten times the cruising speed of a commercial jet aeroplane and would mean travelling from New York to Los Angeles in about 35 minutes. A network of such pipes could be set up between the world's cities, allowing goods to be moved from anywhere to anywhere in a few hours. Some proposals see this as a means of transporting people, a much faster and more efficient alternative to flying. Other designs have narrower tubes used for moving goods around.
  
To build such a system would be a gigantic engineering project, perhaps feasible in a scarcity economy, but requiring enormous initial investment. One optimistic estimate put the cost of building a vaccum-enhance maglev system at $2 million per mile of track [http://et3.com/ett.asp]. This is less than the cost of building a motorway, as the tube is a lot narrower than a motorway and therefore requires less land to be purchased.
+
To build such a system would require considerable initial investment. One optimistic estimate puts the cost of building a vacuum-enhanced maglev system at $2 million per mile of track ($1.25m / km) <sup>[http://et3.com/ett.asp]</sup> for a tube big enough to carry people. It is possible that [[Virtual designs into physical objects#Automated construction|automated construction]] methods would allow track to be extruded cheaply by machines.
 +
 
 +
The running costs, however, would be much lower than air travel and this would justify the initial effort of construction. This is true even if we consider only the financial savings, not to mention the reduced environmental impact and the energy and time saved. It takes at least 3 liters of kerosene to move each passenger one kilometer by plane <sup>[http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air/doc/fuel_report_final.pdf (p. 12)][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_efficiency_in_transportation#Aircraft]</sup>, so fuel costs are over $2.50 per passenger per kilometer<sup>[http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/economics/fuel_monitor/Pages/index.aspx]</sup>. By contrast, the energy requirements of VacMagLev are tiny and could easily be met by [[Energy#Solar|solar panels]] on the tubes, allowing the system to run at zero fuel cost. If 500,000 passengers are transported, the fuel savings equal the cost of construction ($1.25m / km). For the {{wp|World's_busiest_passenger_air_routes|world's 50 busiest air routes}}, this number would be met in just the first two months of operation.
 +
 
 +
In July 2013, the VacMagLev concept was reawakend by Elon Musk with a design he calls the {{wp|Hyperloop|Hyperloop}}.

Latest revision as of 23:47, 17 July 2013

VacMagLev.jpg

As noted above, trains are one of the most energy-efficient means of moving people and freight from A to B. What energy is lost is mostly due to the friction between the wheels and and the track, and the friction between the train and the air (i.e. air resistance). Magnetic levitation (MagLev) trains solve the first of these; they have no friction between the trains and the tracks because the train does not touch the track. Instead it hovers above it due to electromagnetic repulsion between the two. MagLev trains are therefore much more efficient and capable of greater speeds than ordinary trains. MagLev trains have been in use for decades. The second energy-drain, air resistance, can be eliminated by housing the MagLev train in a vacuum. This is called vacuum-enhanced magnetic levitation (or VacMagLev, or VacTrain technology, or evacuated tube transport) and was pioneered by Gerard O'Neill, who said that VacMagLev would allow goods to travel "from New York to Orlando in half an hour... [using] less energy than... a liter of gasoline"[1].

Of all the new transport-technology options on the menu for 21st century man, VacMagLev is outstanding for its speed, its energy-efficiency and the ease of automation. One proposal by Daniel Wade outlines how such technology could be used to move goods of any kind around the world at an incredible 3200km/h (2000mph) with minimal energy. The most ambitious designs envision speeds of up to 8000km/h (5000mph). To put this in perspective, this is about ten times the cruising speed of a commercial jet aeroplane and would mean travelling from New York to Los Angeles in about 35 minutes. A network of such pipes could be set up between the world's cities, allowing goods to be moved from anywhere to anywhere in a few hours. Some proposals see this as a means of transporting people, a much faster and more efficient alternative to flying. Other designs have narrower tubes used for moving goods around.

To build such a system would require considerable initial investment. One optimistic estimate puts the cost of building a vacuum-enhanced maglev system at $2 million per mile of track ($1.25m / km) [2] for a tube big enough to carry people. It is possible that automated construction methods would allow track to be extruded cheaply by machines.

The running costs, however, would be much lower than air travel and this would justify the initial effort of construction. This is true even if we consider only the financial savings, not to mention the reduced environmental impact and the energy and time saved. It takes at least 3 liters of kerosene to move each passenger one kilometer by plane (p. 12)[3], so fuel costs are over $2.50 per passenger per kilometer[4]. By contrast, the energy requirements of VacMagLev are tiny and could easily be met by solar panels on the tubes, allowing the system to run at zero fuel cost. If 500,000 passengers are transported, the fuel savings equal the cost of construction ($1.25m / km). For the world's 50 busiest air routes 11px-Wikipedia_logo.jpg, this number would be met in just the first two months of operation.

In July 2013, the VacMagLev concept was reawakend by Elon Musk with a design he calls the Hyperloop 11px-Wikipedia_logo.jpg.