Difference between revisions of "Talk:Free and open-source software"
| (19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{discussion page note}} | |
| + | |||
| + | Google, Amazon etc. built upon opensource | ||
| + | |||
| + | Panel on why people contribute - perhaps shared with collaborative design section | ||
| + | |||
| + | The amazing complexity of some these projects | ||
| + | |||
| + | Wikimedia commons | ||
| + | |||
| + | Books | ||
| + | |||
| + | Creative commons etc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Paragraph largely made redundant by the free riders section: | ||
| + | |||
| + | The fact that thousands of other people are able to make use of the software having put in no effort themselves and haven't paid any money simply isn't an issue - after all it effectively costs nothing to replicate the software and the open-source developers are only too happy that it is proving useful to a wider audience. It is truly maximizing it's utility. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Other software to list: | ||
| + | *Open source radio: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6241923.stm | ||
| + | *http://www.jokosher.org/ | ||
| + | *koffice | ||
| + | *Scribus | ||
| + | *Wiki and content management software | ||
| + | *POVRay | ||
| + | |||
| + | Mention that Google, ebay, amazon, internet are all based on free and open-source software - need to check facts | ||
| + | |||
| + | Explain that within a particular project there is control over who can submit code (i.e. not like wikipedia in that sense) | ||
| + | |||
| + | How everybody wins with open source: http://www.linux.com/feature/136123 | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7487060.stm BBC article by Stallman about Free software] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Free and open-source software/What is so good about it?]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://www.blackducksoftware.com/news/releases/2008-12-09 Mythos about OS application development] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:47, 23 January 2009
| This 'discussion page' is currently used to hold notes for the development of this website (however it can still be used for discussion) |
|---|
Google, Amazon etc. built upon opensource
Panel on why people contribute - perhaps shared with collaborative design section
The amazing complexity of some these projects
Wikimedia commons
Books
Creative commons etc.
Paragraph largely made redundant by the free riders section:
The fact that thousands of other people are able to make use of the software having put in no effort themselves and haven't paid any money simply isn't an issue - after all it effectively costs nothing to replicate the software and the open-source developers are only too happy that it is proving useful to a wider audience. It is truly maximizing it's utility.
Other software to list:
- Open source radio: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6241923.stm
- http://www.jokosher.org/
- koffice
- Scribus
- Wiki and content management software
- POVRay
Mention that Google, ebay, amazon, internet are all based on free and open-source software - need to check facts
Explain that within a particular project there is control over who can submit code (i.e. not like wikipedia in that sense)
How everybody wins with open source: http://www.linux.com/feature/136123
BBC article by Stallman about Free software
