Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fundamental resources"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{discussion page note}} | {{discussion page note}} | ||
| − | |||
Find reference about humanity due to generate more information in the next 10 years than in the previous 100. | Find reference about humanity due to generate more information in the next 10 years than in the previous 100. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
http://spacesolarpower.wordpress.com/ | http://spacesolarpower.wordpress.com/ | ||
| − | + | [[Image:Solucar.jpg|right|250px]] | |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7013068.stm Severn tidal power | http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7013068.stm Severn tidal power | ||
Revision as of 17:19, 30 October 2007
| This 'discussion page' is currently used to hold notes for the development of this website (however it can still be used for discussion) |
|---|
Find reference about humanity due to generate more information in the next 10 years than in the previous 100.
Non-elemental resources such as fresh water, useful compounds, crude oil etc.
Ultimate solar when photovolataic coatings become cheap and efficient enough: covering pavements, roads and roofs.
Note about undersea ore, not just from land.
Slashdot geothermal discussion: [1]
http://spacesolarpower.wordpress.com/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7013068.stm Severn tidal power
Human intelligence section needs to link to education
John Gelles note
Fundamental resources includes "information" and I say "information" includes "money".
My point is that "money" (and its reform) is the giant blockage in the road to advanced civilization.
Where I'm coming from: read http://wiki-debate.wikispaces.com and see I'm coming from a request I made to Wikimedia to tell me if "Wiki-Debate" is already a Wikipedia project or capability.
Wikimedia replied in a way that lead me to your site for my first visit. Their reply is posted to the wiki-debate space mentioned above.
I joined your org. because the fundamental purpose of WikiDebate is to argue for a world beyond scarcity.
My thought at the moment is that you have too little emphasis on "money and its reform" as a key use of information from this point forward.
You might consider where the best place is (in your presentation) for "money" and its immediate use to fight scarcity and to accelerate the technological development that surely will bring all you claim for it.
emails: indexed-savings at sbcglobal.net / john.gelles at gmail.com
-- johngelles 01:08, 22 February 2007
