Difference between revisions of "Talk:Energy"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-world-can-be-powered-by-alternative-energy-using-todays-technology-in-20-40-years - Study by Stanford professors showing that we can meet energy needs using wind, solar and hydroelectric power, without even factoring in advances in solar technology. | ||
| + | |||
http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=110648&org=NSF&from=news<br><small>"By perfecting the environment for the bacteria to do what they already do in nature, the new approach can be three to ten times more efficient than standard electrolysis."</small> | http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=110648&org=NSF&from=news<br><small>"By perfecting the environment for the bacteria to do what they already do in nature, the new approach can be three to ten times more efficient than standard electrolysis."</small> | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
** http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2009/january7/power-010709.html | ** http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2009/january7/power-010709.html | ||
* David MacKay - http://www.withouthotair.com | * David MacKay - http://www.withouthotair.com | ||
| − | * Zero-point energy. Uncontroversial that it exists | + | * Zero-point energy. Uncontroversial that it exists, but highly controversial whether it can be harnessed. |
==Solar== | ==Solar== | ||
| − | [[Image:Solucar.jpg|right|250px]]*High efficiency, low cost photosynthetic PV cells [http://www.eetimes.eu/uk/207403402] | + | * [[Image:Solucar.jpg|right|250px]]*High efficiency, low cost photosynthetic PV cells [http://www.eetimes.eu/uk/207403402] |
* http://www.appropedia.org/User:J.M.Pearce | * http://www.appropedia.org/User:J.M.Pearce | ||
* http://spacesolarpower.wordpress.com/ | * http://spacesolarpower.wordpress.com/ | ||
Revision as of 15:45, 27 January 2011
http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-world-can-be-powered-by-alternative-energy-using-todays-technology-in-20-40-years - Study by Stanford professors showing that we can meet energy needs using wind, solar and hydroelectric power, without even factoring in advances in solar technology.
http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=110648&org=NSF&from=news
"By perfecting the environment for the bacteria to do what they already do in nature, the new approach can be three to ten times more efficient than standard electrolysis."
Less then $1 per watt water-cooled fresnel focussing sun-tracking unit
- Ocean depth heat differential. NS article on OTEC
- Focus fusion
- http://www.fusor.net - open-source fusion
- "People typically think of Hiroshima or the Chernobyl disaster when they hear the word nuclear. And when they hear it they should think sun... because what they are building is a miniature synthetic star. A fusion reaction is a star... a star in a jar"
- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7013068.stm Severn tidal power
- http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/Journals/EE/article.asp?doi=b809990c
- David MacKay - http://www.withouthotair.com
- Zero-point energy. Uncontroversial that it exists, but highly controversial whether it can be harnessed.
Contents
Solar
- *High efficiency, low cost photosynthetic PV cells [1]
- http://www.appropedia.org/User:J.M.Pearce
- http://spacesolarpower.wordpress.com/
- http://www.popsci.com/popsci/flat/bown/2007/green/item_59.html
Desertec
- Trans-Mediterranean Renewable Energy Cooperation (TREC)
Solar raft
Thought: Solar rafts floating on oceans near equatorial regions, more efficient than OTEC and wouldn't tak up land area. Sea conditions there are generally benign. Rafts in grid could be spread out a bit to let in light underneath. Underneath they would also create a floating habitat as happens naturally with large floating objects in the ocean. This provides an anchor for plants which allows fish to hide in an otherwise open ocean. It could perhaps be an automated site for liquifying hydrogen that could be split from seawater, aiding the hydrogen economy. This could be shipped or piped around the world. See also Stratospheric solar array. --CharlesC 16:01, 18 July 2010 (CEST)
- Good idea. SolarLab are working on a plant to generate hydrogen from seawater [2] --Balatro 18:39, 18 July 2010 (CEST)
- Ah - good find! --CharlesC 00:58, 19 July 2010 (CEST)
Geothermal
- http://thefutureofthings.com/news/1258/alaska-opts-for-underground-energy.html
- http://www.altarockenergy.com - geothermal energy company
- Slashdot geothermal discussion: [3]
- Year-End Review: Geothermal Energy on Launch Trajectory in 2009
