Difference between revisions of "Open collaborative design/Isn't this design by committee?"
From AdCiv
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | It has been said that a camel is a horse designed by committee... Won't this | + | '''It has been said that a camel is a horse designed by committee... Won't this development model just create a herd of camels?''' |
<p> | <p> | ||
| − | No, because there is no single 'conclusion' that a | + | No, because there is no single 'conclusion' that a design must arrive at (unlike a committee's decision). As with software, it might be that an original design is created by a single motivated individual, or a small group of people with a common purpose and shared vision, but beyond that the design can be evolved in multiple directions by other interested parties who might need a particular variation. |
| + | </p> | ||
| + | Many [[Examples of free and open-source software|fine horses]] have been created within the open-source software world and it will be the same with design and engineering. | ||
Latest revision as of 23:50, 21 November 2008
It has been said that a camel is a horse designed by committee... Won't this development model just create a herd of camels?
No, because there is no single 'conclusion' that a design must arrive at (unlike a committee's decision). As with software, it might be that an original design is created by a single motivated individual, or a small group of people with a common purpose and shared vision, but beyond that the design can be evolved in multiple directions by other interested parties who might need a particular variation.
Many fine horses have been created within the open-source software world and it will be the same with design and engineering.
