Difference between revisions of "Open collaborative design/Isn't this design by committee?"

From AdCiv
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
It has been said a camel is a horse designed by committee... Won't this system produce herds of camels?
+
'''It has been said that a camel is a horse designed by committee... Won't this development model just create a herd of camels?'''
 +
<p>
 +
No, because there is no single 'conclusion' that a design must arrive at (unlike a committee's decision). As with software, it might be that an original design is created by a single motivated individual, or a small group of people with a common purpose and shared vision, but beyond that the design can be evolved in multiple directions by other interested parties who might need a particular variation.
 +
</p>
 +
Many [[Examples of free and open-source software|fine horses]] have been created within the open-source software world and it will be the same with design and engineering.

Latest revision as of 22:50, 21 November 2008

It has been said that a camel is a horse designed by committee... Won't this development model just create a herd of camels?

No, because there is no single 'conclusion' that a design must arrive at (unlike a committee's decision). As with software, it might be that an original design is created by a single motivated individual, or a small group of people with a common purpose and shared vision, but beyond that the design can be evolved in multiple directions by other interested parties who might need a particular variation.

Many fine horses have been created within the open-source software world and it will be the same with design and engineering.