Difference between revisions of "Free and open-source software/Beyond software"

From AdCiv
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Wikipedia logo.jpg|120px|right|Wikipedia logo]] This methodology originated with software development but is certainly not limited to it. A notable example beyond software is the 'open content' [http://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia], the famous collaborative encyclopaedia which is accessible and editable by anyone with a web browser. Its founder Jimmy Wales ambitiously states that he wants to capture the knowledge of all humanity and make it freely accessible to everyone - and the project to date is a very impressive start. It was started in 2001 and is now the largest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world grown organically by the contributions (and editing) of thousands of users, and the overall quality of articles on the whole is surprisingly good. See [http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html this article] from the journal ''Nature'' comparing Wikipedia to Britannica.
+
[[Image:Wikipedia logo.jpg|90px|right|Wikipedia logo]] This methodology originated with software development but is certainly not limited to it. A notable example beyond software is the 'open content' [http://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia], the famous collaborative encyclopaedia which is accessible and editable by anyone with a web browser. Its founder Jimmy Wales ambitiously states that he wants to capture the knowledge of all humanity and make it freely accessible to everyone - and the project to date is a very impressive start. It was started in 2001 and is now the largest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world grown organically by the contributions (and editing) of thousands of users, and the overall quality of articles on the whole is surprisingly good. See [http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html this article] from the journal ''Nature'' comparing Wikipedia to Britannica.
  
 
With a few built-in mechanisms to make sure the project doesn't dissolve into total chaos, the result is that this pool of knowledge is assembled and edited by people who want to do it and is now an amazing resource for anyone wanting a basic introduction to almost any subject. No-one is paying them to do it and no-one is telling them to do it, they contribute because they want to. It feels like the right thing to do - they are contributing to something greater. Contributors' know their efforts will be used and appreciated by thousands of other people, and that others are doing likewise. It is worth noting that like all encyclopaedias Wikipedia is not a 'primary source' for information and should be considered only as providing a useful introduction to a topic. It is always worth cross-referencing information from other sources too.
 
With a few built-in mechanisms to make sure the project doesn't dissolve into total chaos, the result is that this pool of knowledge is assembled and edited by people who want to do it and is now an amazing resource for anyone wanting a basic introduction to almost any subject. No-one is paying them to do it and no-one is telling them to do it, they contribute because they want to. It feels like the right thing to do - they are contributing to something greater. Contributors' know their efforts will be used and appreciated by thousands of other people, and that others are doing likewise. It is worth noting that like all encyclopaedias Wikipedia is not a 'primary source' for information and should be considered only as providing a useful introduction to a topic. It is always worth cross-referencing information from other sources too.

Revision as of 23:53, 18 February 2007

Wikipedia logo
This methodology originated with software development but is certainly not limited to it. A notable example beyond software is the 'open content' Wikipedia, the famous collaborative encyclopaedia which is accessible and editable by anyone with a web browser. Its founder Jimmy Wales ambitiously states that he wants to capture the knowledge of all humanity and make it freely accessible to everyone - and the project to date is a very impressive start. It was started in 2001 and is now the largest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world grown organically by the contributions (and editing) of thousands of users, and the overall quality of articles on the whole is surprisingly good. See this article from the journal Nature comparing Wikipedia to Britannica.

With a few built-in mechanisms to make sure the project doesn't dissolve into total chaos, the result is that this pool of knowledge is assembled and edited by people who want to do it and is now an amazing resource for anyone wanting a basic introduction to almost any subject. No-one is paying them to do it and no-one is telling them to do it, they contribute because they want to. It feels like the right thing to do - they are contributing to something greater. Contributors' know their efforts will be used and appreciated by thousands of other people, and that others are doing likewise. It is worth noting that like all encyclopaedias Wikipedia is not a 'primary source' for information and should be considered only as providing a useful introduction to a topic. It is always worth cross-referencing information from other sources too.

It is apparent that these methods could also be applied to the design of physical machines and artefacts. With this development model designs, photos, instructions and CAD models are stored on the internet for others to use and improve upon. Design and engineering is arguably even more suited to this method than software design. This is because looking at a CAD model, especially if animated, allows an intuitive understanding of how the object functions, whereas software is composed of reams of (often obscure) programming code.

See also

Refresh Free and open-source software with updated text