Difference between revisions of "Colonising Space/Access to space"

From AdCiv
Jump to: navigation, search
((Balatro) I'm not disagreeing necessarily about the space gun, it is very interesting. But ultimately we are focusing on manned spaceflight here, so breakthrough tech in regard to that should be focus)
 
(26 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
We now have access to space using rockets. However this is an expensive way to get into space (over $5000 per pound of material launched<sup>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_elevator_economics#Costs_of_current_systems_.28rockets.29]</sup>) and the failure rate is high. So far, we have only dipped our toes into space; if we want to really dive in, we need an efficient, reliable way of getting large amounts of material beyond the Earth's gravitational pull.
+
We now have access to space using rockets although this is still expensive (over $5000 per pound of material launched<sup>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_elevator_economics#Costs_of_current_systems_.28rockets.29]</sup>) and the failure rate is quite high. This severely limits what we can do in space; it is the main obstacle to [[Energy|space solar power]] and the colonisation of space. So far, we have only dipped our toes, if we want to really dive in we have to make spaceflight cheap and reliable.
  
−
While incremental improvements in rocket technology may suffice, several very different ways of getting off the planet have been proposed.  
+
It may be that using abundant solar energy and seawater and [[advanced automation]], mature rocket technologies like liquid-fuelled rockets actually end up becoming cheap and common-place, perhaps in conjunction with solid-rocket boosters like the Space Shuttle uses that employ metal fuels and inorganic oxidizers made from [[Material|common elements]].
  
−
*Multi-stage rocket
+
[[Image:Skylon climbing.jpg|thumb|[http://www.reactionengines.co.uk/skylon.html Skylon] single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) hybrid air-breathing/rocket space-plane designed to carry 40 tonnes of cargo or 40 passengers to low earth orbit]]
−
*Aircraft piggy-back
+
However many alternative and interesting launch systems are thought to be technically (or at least theoretically) feasible ranging from single stage to orbit hybrid air-breathing/rocket space-planes (SSTOs), electromagnetic and balloon platform launch assist to more exotic space fountains, launch loops and geosynchronous space elevators. It may be that launch strategies that can have their power systems decoupled from the propellant/propulsion systems and installed on the ground may end up being more economical and efficient in terms of energy expended per unit weight lofted into space.
−
*{{wp|Scramjet|Scramjet}} / rocket hybrid, such as the {{wp|Single-stage-to-orbit|single stage to orbit}} (SSTO) {{wp|Skylon|''Skylon''}} launch vehicle
+
 
−
*Balloon platform.
+
Information on these alternative launch methods are covered in more detail in this {{wp|Non-rocket_spacelaunch|WP article}}.
−
*Space guns like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_HARP HARP]
+
−
*Other theoretical methods
+
−
**Linear motor assisted launch from high altitude terrain
+
−
**{{wp|Space_elevator|Space elevator}}. Picture a satellite tethered to the Earth {{em}} a large weight in geosynchronous orbit is attached by a strong, long, light cable (probably made using [[carbon nanotubes]], though there is controversy over whether these can be made strong enough) to an anchor-point on the planet's surface. Robots could climb this cable, carrying payloads into space. This is expected to reduce the cost of transporting a pound of material into space to $100 <sup>[http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/story.html?id=3dd5119f-1951-46a5-b4af-bd9eb49228a9]</sup>, which would completely open up space to all kinds of new ventures. However, there are still many challenges to be overcome before a space elevator is viable: the robots that ascend the cable need a reliable power source, there are dangers of the cable being snapped by lightning strikes, asteroids or orbiting debris and there is doubt as to whether cables can be made strong enough to withstand the tension generated by such an enormous structure.
+
−
**A {{wp|Launch_loop|launch loop}} (illustrated [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCwVjUZV92Q here]) is perhaps more feasible than a space elevator. It is essentially a conveyor belt to space. It consists of a loop of iron cable anchored on the surface of the Earth at one end, and at a height of 125km above the Earth at the other end. The loop passes through electromagnetic bearings at each end. These bearings spin the cable at high speeds, which creates a centrifugal force that lifts the cable up into an enormous loop, the top half of which is in space. Payloads can use magnets to attach themselves to the cable and ride it into space, detaching at the end.
+

Latest revision as of 15:57, 15 April 2012

We now have access to space using rockets although this is still expensive (over $5000 per pound of material launched[1]) and the failure rate is quite high. This severely limits what we can do in space; it is the main obstacle to space solar power and the colonisation of space. So far, we have only dipped our toes, if we want to really dive in we have to make spaceflight cheap and reliable.

It may be that using abundant solar energy and seawater and advanced automation, mature rocket technologies like liquid-fuelled rockets actually end up becoming cheap and common-place, perhaps in conjunction with solid-rocket boosters like the Space Shuttle uses that employ metal fuels and inorganic oxidizers made from common elements.

Skylon single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) hybrid air-breathing/rocket space-plane designed to carry 40 tonnes of cargo or 40 passengers to low earth orbit

However many alternative and interesting launch systems are thought to be technically (or at least theoretically) feasible ranging from single stage to orbit hybrid air-breathing/rocket space-planes (SSTOs), electromagnetic and balloon platform launch assist to more exotic space fountains, launch loops and geosynchronous space elevators. It may be that launch strategies that can have their power systems decoupled from the propellant/propulsion systems and installed on the ground may end up being more economical and efficient in terms of energy expended per unit weight lofted into space.

Information on these alternative launch methods are covered in more detail in this WP article 11px-Wikipedia_logo.jpg.

Retrieved from "http://adciv.org/wiki/index.php?title=Colonising_Space/Access_to_space&oldid=9450"