Difference between revisions of "Talk:Open collaborative design"
From AdCiv
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*[[/Old]] | *[[/Old]] | ||
− | Open design really ought to be renamed "Open design and engineering" ODE. Interestingly there is also an open-source physics engine called [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_dynamics_engine ODE] | + | Open design really ought to be renamed "Open design and engineering" ODE. Or perhaps FODE. Interestingly there is also an open-source physics engine called [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_dynamics_engine ODE] |
Open source hardware | Open source hardware |
Revision as of 23:31, 16 October 2006
Open design really ought to be renamed "Open design and engineering" ODE. Or perhaps FODE. Interestingly there is also an open-source physics engine called ODE
Open source hardware
Open culture
Explaining about freeloaders
http://www.tech-edv.co.at/lunix/CADlinks.html
The importance of documenting and explaining stuff, both for design and software projects. The more things are made intelligable to others, the more likely it is that people join in and help make stuff happen, better harnessing our collective intelligence. (Humans are lazy yet capable!)