Difference between revisions of "AdCiv:About"

From AdCiv
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
It is not an encylopedia. The idea is to use the flexible nature of a wiki to collaborate and evolve ideas relating to advancing civilization. As such the guidelines for how to contribute are different to a project such as [http://en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia]:
 
It is not an encylopedia. The idea is to use the flexible nature of a wiki to collaborate and evolve ideas relating to advancing civilization. As such the guidelines for how to contribute are different to a project such as [http://en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia]:
  
# There is no 'neutral point of view' policy. There is no problem with people contributing material that expresses their point of view - this is necessary for discussion.
+
* There is no 'neutral point of view' policy. There is no problem with people contributing material that expresses their point of view - this is necessary for discussion.
# We are looking for people who can contribute positively to this project. It is fine to submit criticism, but it should be constructive, somehow adding to the evolution of the project.
+
* We are looking for people who can contribute positively to this project. It is fine to submit criticism, but it should be constructive, somehow adding to the evolution of the project.
  
 
==================
 
==================
  
 
Something about dispersing the knowledge too.
 
Something about dispersing the knowledge too.

Revision as of 22:54, 16 September 2005

This website is for developing ideas and practical solutions to help bring forward the coming post-scarcity age. We intend there to be a practical side to the project, putting the ideas into action to help progress society in a positive direction, and not just to exist for pure discourse and speculation.

It is not an encylopedia. The idea is to use the flexible nature of a wiki to collaborate and evolve ideas relating to advancing civilization. As such the guidelines for how to contribute are different to a project such as Wikipedia:

  • There is no 'neutral point of view' policy. There is no problem with people contributing material that expresses their point of view - this is necessary for discussion.
  • We are looking for people who can contribute positively to this project. It is fine to submit criticism, but it should be constructive, somehow adding to the evolution of the project.
======

Something about dispersing the knowledge too.