Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fundamental resources"

From AdCiv
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: {{discussion page note}})
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{discussion page note}}
 
{{discussion page note}}
 +
 +
Fundamental resources includes "information" and I say "information" includes "money".
 +
 +
My point is that "money" (and its reform) is the giant blockage in the road to advanced civilization.
 +
 +
Where I'm coming from: read http://wiki-debate.wikispaces.com and see I'm coming from a request I made to Wikimedia to tell me if "Wiki-Debate" is already a Wikipedia project or capability.
 +
 +
Wikimedia replied in a way that lead me to your site for my first visit. Their reply is posted to the wiki-debate space  mentioned above.
 +
 +
I joined your org. because the fundamental purpose of WikiDebate is to argue for a world beyond scarcity.
 +
 +
My thought at the moment is that you have too little emphasis on "money and its reform" as a key use of information from this point forward.
 +
 +
You might consider where the best place is (in your presentation) for "money" and its immediate use to fight scarcity and to accelerate the technological development that surely will bring all you claim for it.
 +
 +
John Gelles
 +
emails: indexed-savings@sbcglobal.net
 +
        john.gelles@gmail.com

Revision as of 02:08, 22 February 2007

This 'discussion page' is currently used to hold notes for the development of this website (however it can still be used for discussion)

Fundamental resources includes "information" and I say "information" includes "money".

My point is that "money" (and its reform) is the giant blockage in the road to advanced civilization.

Where I'm coming from: read http://wiki-debate.wikispaces.com and see I'm coming from a request I made to Wikimedia to tell me if "Wiki-Debate" is already a Wikipedia project or capability.

Wikimedia replied in a way that lead me to your site for my first visit. Their reply is posted to the wiki-debate space mentioned above.

I joined your org. because the fundamental purpose of WikiDebate is to argue for a world beyond scarcity.

My thought at the moment is that you have too little emphasis on "money and its reform" as a key use of information from this point forward.

You might consider where the best place is (in your presentation) for "money" and its immediate use to fight scarcity and to accelerate the technological development that surely will bring all you claim for it.

John Gelles emails: indexed-savings@sbcglobal.net

       john.gelles@gmail.com