Difference between revisions of "Talk:Open collaborative design"
From AdCiv
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Importance of ease of use of the tools. Lowering the bar for entry and participation and getting started will make all the difference with these things. | Importance of ease of use of the tools. Lowering the bar for entry and participation and getting started will make all the difference with these things. | ||
| − | |||
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coase%27s_Penguin | *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coase%27s_Penguin | ||
| + | *[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ.htm Democratizing Innovation] | ||
Wikipedia | Wikipedia | ||
Revision as of 23:59, 21 January 2007
This method needs better descriptions of what the hell open source methods and principles are.
Open design really ought to be renamed "Open design and engineering" ODE. Or perhaps FODE. Interestingly there is also an open-source physics engine called ODE
Open source hardware
Open culture
- http://www.tech-edv.co.at/lunix/CADlinks.html
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_computer-aided_design_software
The importance of documenting and explaining stuff, both for design and software projects. The more things are made intelligable to others, the more likely it is that people join in and help make stuff happen, better harnessing our collective intelligence. (Humans are lazy yet capable!)
Importance of ease of use of the tools. Lowering the bar for entry and participation and getting started will make all the difference with these things.
Wikipedia
