Difference between revisions of "AdCiv:About"
From AdCiv
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This website is for developing ideas and practical solutions to help bring forward the coming [[post-scarcity age]] | + | This website is for developing ideas and practical solutions to help bring forward the coming [[post-scarcity age]]. We intend there to be a practical side to the project, putting the ideas into action to help progress society in a positive direction, and not just to exist for pure discourse and speculation. |
It is not an encylopedia. The idea is to use the flexible nature of a wiki to collaborate and evolve ideas relating to advancing civilization. As such the guidelines for how to contribute are different to a project such as [http://en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia]: | It is not an encylopedia. The idea is to use the flexible nature of a wiki to collaborate and evolve ideas relating to advancing civilization. As such the guidelines for how to contribute are different to a project such as [http://en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia]: | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
# There is no 'neutral point of view' policy. There is no problem with people contributing material that expresses their point of view - this is necessary for discussion. | # There is no 'neutral point of view' policy. There is no problem with people contributing material that expresses their point of view - this is necessary for discussion. | ||
| − | # We are looking for people who can contribute positively to this project | + | # We are looking for people who can contribute positively to this project. Criticism is fine, but it should be constructive, somehow adding to the evolution of the project. |
| + | |||
| + | ================== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Something about dispersing the knowledge too. | ||
Revision as of 21:58, 16 September 2005
This website is for developing ideas and practical solutions to help bring forward the coming post-scarcity age. We intend there to be a practical side to the project, putting the ideas into action to help progress society in a positive direction, and not just to exist for pure discourse and speculation.
It is not an encylopedia. The idea is to use the flexible nature of a wiki to collaborate and evolve ideas relating to advancing civilization. As such the guidelines for how to contribute are different to a project such as Wikipedia:
- There is no 'neutral point of view' policy. There is no problem with people contributing material that expresses their point of view - this is necessary for discussion.
- We are looking for people who can contribute positively to this project. Criticism is fine, but it should be constructive, somehow adding to the evolution of the project.
======
Something about dispersing the knowledge too.
