Difference between revisions of "Food/Intro"

From AdCiv
Jump to: navigation, search
(Picure of meat&veg is more appropriate than fruit & sugar cane)
 
(39 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Many people believe that as the population is rising, we are facing a global food shortage. 40% of farming land is now {{wp|Land_degradation|depleted}}, rainforests must be cut down to make room for more farming and as droves of people move from farms into cities, and their appetite for meat is growing<sup>[http://oecdinsights.org/2010/02/19/cashing-in-on-cows/]</sup>, food demand is rising, while the ability to supply it is falling.
+
[[Image:Food.gif|180px|right]]Many people believe that we are soon to face a global food shortage. Population is rising rapidly, with a billion people added in less than ten years. 40% of farming land has been {{wp|Land_degradation|depleted}} and rainforests have been cut down to make more room for farming. Farmers are moving into cities at the rate of over a million a week <sup>[http://www.makingcitieswork.org/toolsAndResources/urbanResources/urban101]</sup>, and our appetite for meat is growing<sup>[http://oecdinsights.org/2010/02/19/cashing-in-on-cows/]</sup>. These trends means that food demand is rising, but there are fewer farmers to supply it, while the basis of our agricultural production is under strain. It would indeed seem that we are heading for a food crisis.
  
What this analysis misses is that it is in no way necessary to produce food in the massively inefficient ways used to paint this dire picture. The food shortage is really a shortage of applying [[Fundamental resources/Human intelligence|know-how]] to food production. While certain farming methods do deplete soil, thereby reducing the amount of useful land, other farming methods (like permaculture, discussed below) reliably increase the fertility of the soil.  
+
But this story misses a key point: there are far better ways to produce food than the ones now in wide use. While it is true that conventional plough agriculture and monoculture is driving the world towards a food crisis, there are ways to grow food using very little land, very little labour and no pollution. The aim of this page is to explore these methods and show how they can comfortably sustain a growing population. Any food shortage is really a shortage of applying this [[Fundamental resources/Human intelligence|know-how]] to food production.
  
It is often said that it requires 16 kilos of grain to produce one kilo of beef. For this reason it has been argued that we must all become vegetarian to avoid a food crisis<sup>[http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/global-food-shortage-fear/story-e6frf7l6-1111115339654]</sup>. This makes the assumption that cows must be fed grain. Cows eat grass. Grass is not edible by humans, so no useful food resources are being wasted, and beef from grass-fed cows has a better nutritional profile than from grain-fed animals<sup>[http://www.nwhealth.edu/healthyu/eatWell/grassfed.html]</sup>. Similar logic applies to other kinds of meat.
+
It is possible, with current know-how, to create a food-production system that can provide tens of billions of people with abundant, local, nutritious, tasty food, textiles and wood, while economizing water, restoring soil, building communities, saving energy, creating pleasing landscapes, preserving wilderness, stopping diseases, needing virtually no inputs and benefiting not just people, but the rest of the biosphere as well.
 
+
Estimates of how much land is required to grow a person's food vary, but 60-100m<sup>2</sup> seems reasonable, if modern techniques of organic permaculture are used. (That means you could grow enough food for 4-7 people on an area the size of a basketball court.) In cities with high population densities, it would be desirable to reduce this even further.
+
 
+
This planet has 31,800,000km<sup>2</sup>, or 31.8 trillion m<sup>2</sup>, of {{wp|Arable_land|fertile land}}. Even taking a pessimistic estimate of 200m<sup>2</sup> farming land per person, this would grow enough food for 159 billion people.
+
 
+
Food supplies can be made more resilient by decentralizing production. [[Decentralization|Decentralized]] food production would mean a reduction in transport costs and would preserve the freshness and nutritional value of our food and eliminate the need for harmful preservatives, energy-expensive refrigeration and food storage. Most importantly, it would create resilience; no one would starve due to the inefficiency and injustice of the distribution of our food-resources.
+
 
+
However, traditional methods of decentralized food production are rather labour-intensive. For many people, growing their own food is a very enjoyable and rewarding sort of labour that they willingly devote their energies to. Others would like the option of avoiding this labour. For those folk, it is now possible to [[Advanced automation|automate]] food production (see below).
+

Latest revision as of 01:09, 18 April 2012

Food.gif
Many people believe that we are soon to face a global food shortage. Population is rising rapidly, with a billion people added in less than ten years. 40% of farming land has been depleted 11px-Wikipedia_logo.jpg and rainforests have been cut down to make more room for farming. Farmers are moving into cities at the rate of over a million a week [1], and our appetite for meat is growing[2]. These trends means that food demand is rising, but there are fewer farmers to supply it, while the basis of our agricultural production is under strain. It would indeed seem that we are heading for a food crisis.

But this story misses a key point: there are far better ways to produce food than the ones now in wide use. While it is true that conventional plough agriculture and monoculture is driving the world towards a food crisis, there are ways to grow food using very little land, very little labour and no pollution. The aim of this page is to explore these methods and show how they can comfortably sustain a growing population. Any food shortage is really a shortage of applying this know-how to food production.

It is possible, with current know-how, to create a food-production system that can provide tens of billions of people with abundant, local, nutritious, tasty food, textiles and wood, while economizing water, restoring soil, building communities, saving energy, creating pleasing landscapes, preserving wilderness, stopping diseases, needing virtually no inputs and benefiting not just people, but the rest of the biosphere as well.