Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fundamental resources"

From AdCiv
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{discussion page note}}
 
{{discussion page note}}
 +
Find reference about humanity due to generate more information in the next 10 years than in the previous 100.
  
Fundamental resources includes "information" and I say "information" includes "money".
+
Non-elemental resources such as fresh water, useful compounds, crude oil etc.
  
My point is that "money" (and its reform) is the giant blockage in the road to advanced civilization.
+
Note about undersea ore, not just from land. Also asteroids.
  
Where I'm coming from: read http://wiki-debate.wikispaces.com and see I'm coming from a request I made to Wikimedia to tell me if "Wiki-Debate" is already a Wikipedia project or capability.
+
[http://www.newscientist.com/blog/technology/2008/03/not-drop-to-drink.html fresh water]
  
Wikimedia replied in a way that lead me to your site for my first visit. Their reply is posted to the wiki-debate space  mentioned above.
+
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundances_of_the_elements_(data_page)
  
I joined your org. because the fundamental purpose of WikiDebate is to argue for a world beyond scarcity.
+
[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39441929/ns/technology_and_science-discovery.com Gigawatts from the solar wind]
  
My thought at the moment is that you have too little emphasis on "money and its reform" as a key use of information from this point forward.
+
Section on land (secondary): Making better use of existing built land; underground; fixed platforms shallow water, floating, other planetary bodies, free-space structures.
  
You might consider where the best place is (in your presentation) for "money" and its immediate use to fight scarcity and to accelerate the technological development that surely will bring all you claim for it.
+
Also floating aeroponic platforms for farming?
  
John Gelles
+
:It's intuitive to dismiss the oceans and think that our resources are only the ones on land; it's as though we have a blind spot covering 69% of our planet! Actually we can grow ''more'' food in an acre of ocean than an acre of land (and probably generate more energy on average too). As for habitation, see the work of [http://www.seasteading.org/ the Seasteading Institute] or [http://inhabitat.com/lilypad-floating-cities-in-the-age-of-global-warming/ Vincent Callebaut's Lillypad concept] for an arcology at sea. We think of the Atlantic Ocean almost as an inconvenience, an obstacle separating two continents, something to be flown across; it's a huge game-changer to start thinking that it could be a sustainable home for millions of people. --[[User:Balatro|Balatro]] 22:14, 6 December 2012 (CET)
emails: indexed-savings@sbcglobal.net
+
 
        john.gelles@gmail.com
+
== Other ==
 +
 
 +
* [http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090912144809.htm Drilling without drill bits]

Latest revision as of 22:14, 6 December 2012

This 'discussion page' is currently used to hold notes for the development of this website (however it can still be used for discussion)

Find reference about humanity due to generate more information in the next 10 years than in the previous 100.

Non-elemental resources such as fresh water, useful compounds, crude oil etc.

Note about undersea ore, not just from land. Also asteroids.

fresh water

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundances_of_the_elements_(data_page)

Gigawatts from the solar wind

Section on land (secondary): Making better use of existing built land; underground; fixed platforms shallow water, floating, other planetary bodies, free-space structures.

Also floating aeroponic platforms for farming?

It's intuitive to dismiss the oceans and think that our resources are only the ones on land; it's as though we have a blind spot covering 69% of our planet! Actually we can grow more food in an acre of ocean than an acre of land (and probably generate more energy on average too). As for habitation, see the work of the Seasteading Institute or Vincent Callebaut's Lillypad concept for an arcology at sea. We think of the Atlantic Ocean almost as an inconvenience, an obstacle separating two continents, something to be flown across; it's a huge game-changer to start thinking that it could be a sustainable home for millions of people. --Balatro 22:14, 6 December 2012 (CET)

Other