Difference between revisions of "Talk:Material"
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landfill_mining | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landfill_mining | ||
| − | + | Desalination | |
| − | + | Water purification | |
| + | |||
| + | Another list of elemental abundance showing that by volume oxygen is an amazing 94.2% [http://www.gly.uga.edu/railsback/Fundamentals/ElementalAbundanceTableP.pdf] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Interesting ephemeralisation essay: http://www.worldtrans.org/essay/ephemeralization.html | ||
| + | |||
| + | Mining undersea | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Fossil hydrocarbons == | ||
| + | (Was part of intro but needs to go somewhere else perhaps): | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fossil hydrocarbons are a limited resource, many would argue, but with regard to energy there are vastly more [[Fundamental resources/Energy|plentiful and greener sources]] available; and as a feedstock for plastics and other useful petrochemical derived materials, renewable {{wp|biomass|biomass}}, {{wp|Biotechnology|biotechnology}} and even {{wp|Organic_synthesis|organic synthesis}} could replace our reliance on crude oil if necessary. Our current heavy use of fossil fuel is due to convenience and the fact that current economics make the alternatives appear less viable in comparison. However conventional economics distorts the perception of what is possible and simply dictates what is easier when working within the current framework that we have inherited from times past. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Although putting hydrocarbons to use for the production of useful (non-fuel) polymers is not such an issue as burning it... | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Panel on carbon == | ||
| + | "A note about carbon" | ||
| + | *Nanotube structure | ||
| + | *Harvesting from atmosphere & reducing atmspheric CO2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | A notable absentee from the list of the 20 most abundant elements is copper which currently is indespensible, however carbon may well replace it for many electrical conduction applications as in the right form it has the potential to be an even more efficient conductor - see {{wp|Carbon_nanotube|carbon nanotube}}. Depending on the orientation of nanotube lattices, they can be conducting, semi-conducting or insulating | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Nanotube composites | ||
| + | *buckypaper | ||
| + | *graphene oxide paper | ||
| + | |||
| + | Construction | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sections: electrical and mechanical / structural | ||
| + | |||
| + | e.g. Engine | ||
Latest revision as of 21:25, 30 January 2010
| This 'discussion page' is currently used to hold notes for the development of this website (however it can still be used for discussion) |
|---|
Carbon might replace copper in many applications [1]
'Less material' frame (see hidden code on article page). Needs to fit in better
See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crust_%28geology%29#Composition_of_the_crust
Mining in vast monotonous abyssal plains under the sea with minimum destruction to nature
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landfill_mining
Desalination
Water purification
Another list of elemental abundance showing that by volume oxygen is an amazing 94.2% [2]
Interesting ephemeralisation essay: http://www.worldtrans.org/essay/ephemeralization.html
Mining undersea
Fossil hydrocarbons
(Was part of intro but needs to go somewhere else perhaps):
Fossil hydrocarbons are a limited resource, many would argue, but with regard to energy there are vastly more plentiful and greener sources available; and as a feedstock for plastics and other useful petrochemical derived materials, renewable biomass 
, biotechnology and even organic synthesis could replace our reliance on crude oil if necessary. Our current heavy use of fossil fuel is due to convenience and the fact that current economics make the alternatives appear less viable in comparison. However conventional economics distorts the perception of what is possible and simply dictates what is easier when working within the current framework that we have inherited from times past.
Although putting hydrocarbons to use for the production of useful (non-fuel) polymers is not such an issue as burning it...
Panel on carbon
"A note about carbon"
- Nanotube structure
- Harvesting from atmosphere & reducing atmspheric CO2
A notable absentee from the list of the 20 most abundant elements is copper which currently is indespensible, however carbon may well replace it for many electrical conduction applications as in the right form it has the potential to be an even more efficient conductor - see carbon nanotube . Depending on the orientation of nanotube lattices, they can be conducting, semi-conducting or insulating
- Nanotube composites
- buckypaper
- graphene oxide paper
Construction
Sections: electrical and mechanical / structural
e.g. Engine
