Difference between revisions of "Abundance Journal/Abundance Vol I, Issue 2"
(New page: == The Theory of Value == Economics has no coherent Theory of Value and we must solve this problem if we are to establish the field of Abundance. The Labor Theory of Value has advantages...) |
Marcin ose (Talk | contribs) (→The Theory of Value) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I propose a theory tentatively dubbed the Automation/Technological Theory of Value. All economic value starts with a Gift, the sun, thus there really is such a thing as a free lunch, provided we intelligently use technology to satisfy needs. Man simply uses his mind to harness energy to do work. Rather than a labor theory of value, a "play" theory is more appropriate, as all advances in standard of living come from using technology to always do more with less. | I propose a theory tentatively dubbed the Automation/Technological Theory of Value. All economic value starts with a Gift, the sun, thus there really is such a thing as a free lunch, provided we intelligently use technology to satisfy needs. Man simply uses his mind to harness energy to do work. Rather than a labor theory of value, a "play" theory is more appropriate, as all advances in standard of living come from using technology to always do more with less. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Discussion== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Great point that the economy starts with a gift from the sun. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Critical to the Play Theory of Value is addressing population explosion. As we do well and multiply like bacteria, we find ourselves short of resources very soon. Discussion of checks and balances on population is critical. From the OSE perspective, this point is rather simple - sustain only the population that is sustainable - by using local resources - and make sure that feedback loops on system performance/integrity are clear and functional. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:06, 22 November 2009
The Theory of Value
Economics has no coherent Theory of Value and we must solve this problem if we are to establish the field of Abundance. The Labor Theory of Value has advantages in that it is objective and normative—it states that price should tend toward the cost of production; it also allows us to determine what constitutes equitable exchange. Unfortunately, the LTV does not acknowledge that the amount of labor embodied in products is constantly diminishing with the advance of automation and improvements in capital. Marginal Utility Theory was held to be the replacement for the Labor Theory of Value but this type of utilitarianism is ultimately subjective and can't provide a sane basis for economics. In this approach, all that matters is satisfying an agent's subjective preference. But people might prefer anything at all ( in the case of preference adaptation a person who is used to being abused or deprived—starving—actually adjusts to this condition). Preference satisfaction alone can't serve as the basis for well-being—an agent can easily prefer things that are objectively bad for him. See Amartya Sen-the Capabilities approach to measure agent's welfare in terms of the intrinsically valuable doings/beings he has the capability to achieve.
Binary Economics (Kelso/Adler) put forth after the great depression, advocated a new concept of "productiveness" in which Capital was conceptualized as autonomously doing work.
I propose a theory tentatively dubbed the Automation/Technological Theory of Value. All economic value starts with a Gift, the sun, thus there really is such a thing as a free lunch, provided we intelligently use technology to satisfy needs. Man simply uses his mind to harness energy to do work. Rather than a labor theory of value, a "play" theory is more appropriate, as all advances in standard of living come from using technology to always do more with less.
Discussion
Great point that the economy starts with a gift from the sun.
Critical to the Play Theory of Value is addressing population explosion. As we do well and multiply like bacteria, we find ourselves short of resources very soon. Discussion of checks and balances on population is critical. From the OSE perspective, this point is rather simple - sustain only the population that is sustainable - by using local resources - and make sure that feedback loops on system performance/integrity are clear and functional.
