Difference between revisions of "Open collaborative design/Isn't this design by committee?"
From AdCiv
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
No, because there is no single 'conclusion' that a design must arrive at. As with software, it might be that an original design is created by a single motivated individual, or a small group of people with a common purpose and shared vision. Beyond that, the design can be evolved in multiple directions by other interested parties who might need a particular variation. | No, because there is no single 'conclusion' that a design must arrive at. As with software, it might be that an original design is created by a single motivated individual, or a small group of people with a common purpose and shared vision. Beyond that, the design can be evolved in multiple directions by other interested parties who might need a particular variation. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
| − | Many fine horses have been created within the open-source software world and it will be the same with design and engineering. | + | Many [[Examples of free and open-source software|fine horses]] have been created within the open-source software world and it will be the same with design and engineering. |
Revision as of 22:09, 9 February 2008
It has been said that a camel is a horse designed by committee... Won't this development model just create a herd of camels?
No, because there is no single 'conclusion' that a design must arrive at. As with software, it might be that an original design is created by a single motivated individual, or a small group of people with a common purpose and shared vision. Beyond that, the design can be evolved in multiple directions by other interested parties who might need a particular variation.
Many fine horses have been created within the open-source software world and it will be the same with design and engineering.
