Difference between revisions of "Open collaborative design/Isn't this design by committee?"
From AdCiv
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It has been said that a camel is a horse designed by committee... Won't this development model just create a herd of camels? | It has been said that a camel is a horse designed by committee... Won't this development model just create a herd of camels? | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| − | No, because there is no single 'conclusion' that a design | + | No, because there is no single 'conclusion' that a design must arrive at. As with software, it might be that an original design is created by a single motivated individual, or a small group of people with a common purpose and shared vision. Beyond that, the design can be evolved in multiple directions by other interested parties who might need a particular variation. |
</p> | </p> | ||
Plenty of fine horses have been created within the open-source software world and it will be the same with design and engineering. | Plenty of fine horses have been created within the open-source software world and it will be the same with design and engineering. | ||
Revision as of 15:31, 16 November 2007
It has been said that a camel is a horse designed by committee... Won't this development model just create a herd of camels?
No, because there is no single 'conclusion' that a design must arrive at. As with software, it might be that an original design is created by a single motivated individual, or a small group of people with a common purpose and shared vision. Beyond that, the design can be evolved in multiple directions by other interested parties who might need a particular variation.
Plenty of fine horses have been created within the open-source software world and it will be the same with design and engineering.
